Freedom Convoy found guilty

Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, key organizers of the 2022 “Freedom Convoy” protest in Ottawa, have been found guilty of mischief for their roles in the demonstration. Ontario Court Justice Heather Perkins-McVey delivered the verdict on April 3, 2025, concluding that both individuals knowingly encouraged participants to remain in Ottawa despite the protest’s adverse effects on residents and businesses.

The “Freedom Convoy” began in January 2022 as a protest against COVID-19 public health mandates, with demonstrators occupying downtown Ottawa with the intent to stay until the mandates were lifted. The prolonged occupation led to significant disruptions, prompting legal actions and public outcry.

In addition to the mischief charges, Lich and Barber faced multiple other charges, including intimidation and counseling others to break the law. Barber also faced charges of counseling others to disobey a court order. The court’s decision highlights the legal consequences of organizing and leading protests that result in significant public disruption.

This verdict serves as a precedent for how Canadian courts may handle similar cases in the future, emphasizing the balance between the right to protest and the responsibility to avoid causing undue harm to the public. The sentencing for Lich and Barber is expected to be scheduled in the coming weeks, where the court will determine the penalties for their actions during the “Freedom Convoy” protest.

Trudeau government’s invocation of the Emergencies Act in February 2022—to end the Freedom Convoy protests—was unreasonable and violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 

On January 23, 2024, Justice Richard Mosley of the Federal Court of Canada ruled that the Trudeau government’s invocation of the Emergencies Act in February 2022—to end the Freedom Convoy protests—was unreasonable and violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 

 

 Key Points from the Ruling:

– The court found that the legal threshold for invoking the Emergencies Act was not met.

– Justice Mosley stated that the government failed to demonstrate a “threat to the security of Canada” as required by the Act.

– He ruled that the measures imposed (such as freezing bank accounts) were unconstitutional, violating the rights to liberty and security under Section 7 of the Charter.

 

 Government Response:

– Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Deputy PM Chrystia Freeland defended their decision, stating that it was necessary to restore order.

– The federal government appealed the decision, meaning the case could go to a higher court for review.

 

 Context of the Emergencies Act Invocation:

– The Emergencies Act was invoked on February 14, 2022, to end weeks-long protests in Ottawa and at key border crossings.

– It allowed the government to ban public assembly, freeze bank accounts, and compel tow truck companies to remove vehicles.

 

Justice Mosley’s decision has reignited debates over civil liberties, government overreach, and the use of emergency powers in Canada.

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial